It’s a Long Way There & Back…

Thomas B. Jeffery & Co. 1900-1910

Thomas B. Jeffery & Co., Nash Motor Company, The Thomas B. Jeffery Co., Rambler TimeLine Chronicles| 1 Comment »

Thomas B. Jeffery & Co.

1900-1910

Route 66 Rambler

1907 Rambler Model 47

 

 

When last we left our hero, inventor Thomas Buckland Jeffery had brought the Rambler name to the pinnacle of the bicycle trade. After his close friend and business partner R. Phillip Gormully had passed away, Tommie B. sold out his stake in the bicycle business, only to start all over again with a new passion, at the tender young age of 54.

As we adjust the AMC “Time Command” (a most useful piece of optional equipment) to A.D. 1903, we find that he had established a new line of motorcars in 1900. This new product he also called Rambler, recognizing the need for brand stability. The Rambler bicycle had built a reputation for its build, value, and features.Jeffery continued those same qualities in the new Ramblers. The brand was known as “The Car of Steady Service“.

 

1902 Rambler

 

 

In 1903, TBJ & Co. sold 1350 cars, and was soon expanding the factory to meet production.

 

The design of the cars continued essentially unchanged, except with slightly heavier equipment, including bigger tires and heavier wheels, with the Rambler Runabout Model E, and the Model F.

 

1903 Rambler Model E 1903 Rambler Model F

 

 

The chief difference between the two models was that the Model F was a “stanhope” design, like the Model D. The horsepower of the cars was improved, up from 4 hp to 6 hp.

New test drivers were hired, among them a couple of young brothers by the name of Fred and Augie Duesenburg.

From the newspaper article “Devil Wagon Days” by Dorothy V. Walters, for the Milwaukee Journal:

 

“…For women to drive was quite unusual, but in the summer of 1903, Mrs. George Rowe and Mrs. Nettie Hoyt drove from Beaver Dam to Milwaukee in a three-day trip. This feat received much publicity in Milwaukee papers of that day. The machine which they used is now in the possession of the Dodge County Historical Society. It was a Rambler purchased from the Thomas B. Jeffery Company of Kenosha. Like all but the de luxe early models, it had neither horn nor headlights, and like its contemporaries, it needed frequent repairs…”.

(actually Thomas B. Jeffery & Company.—mike)

The newspaper article above was written in 1946. That same Rambler is still at the Dodge County Historical Society…

 

1902 Rambler Model C at Dodge County H.S.

 

 

Also in 1903, Roy D. Chapin sold his stake in the Automobile Equipment Company, which produced waterproof canopies and chain guards, among other things. That same year, while still working as a tester for Oldsmobile, he joined in a venture known as the E. R. Thomas Motor Car Company, which began operation at the other end of the Great Lakes from Kenosha in Buffalo, New York.

 

Henry Ford organized the Ford Motor Company in Detroit in 1903, the year after The Henry Ford Company went under. That year Ford became third in the U.S to reach mass production, behind Olds and Rambler. The Dodge Brothers canceled their engine-building contract with Oldsmobile to produce engines for Ford Motor in exchange for a 10 percent stake in Ford.

The Mitchell-Lewis Motor Company also began making cars in 1903. The Mitchell & Lewis Company had been producing carriages in Racine, Wisconsin since the 1850’s, and motorcycles since 1901.Another start-up in 1903 was Overland Car Company, in Terre Haute, Indiana, as a division of the Standard Wheel Company. One of their largest dealerships was that of John North Willys, in Elmira, New York. All of these names would become closely tied to that of Rambler in the course of time.

Of muchl arger interest to the automobile industry as a whole, however was the decision of Henry Ford and Thomas B. Jeffery, among others, to dispute the Selden Patent, a blanket patent of an entire automobile. This required all auto makers in the U.S. to pay license royalties to the holder of the patent in order to produce automobiles. The holder of the patent was none other than our old friend, Colonel Albert Augustus Pope. In order to hold a license, a manufacturer had to make application to the Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers.

 

The members of the association approved an application only with a unanimous vote. This gave them control over who would be their competition, and essentially formed a trust.

This organization had come about when Pope’s Electric Vehicles Corporation had obtained the rights to the patent from George Selden, a patent lawyer with a good scam, who had never built a car. Pope promptly sued his main competition, the Winton Motor Company, as Winton had decided to abandon electrics and go with gasoline. Winton lost the decision, and didn’t have money enough to appeal,, as several manufacturers had joined with Pope to provide legal money. Winton and these other makers, among them Olds, Cadillac, E.R. Thomas, and Mitchell, formed theALAM.

The inventor and successful patent warrior Thomas B. Jeffery was of the opinion that the patent wasn’t “worth the paper it was printed on,” in his words. Many in the industry, including Henry Ford, encouraged him to fight the patent, as he was the most successful patent litigator among them to that date, winning every U.S. Patent dispute he had engaged in. But with his boyhood friendR. Phillip Gormully now dead, he didn’t really have the stomach for it. Gormully had been the “front-end man” to Jeffery’s role as engineer, and it had been he who had guided the successful challenge to the Lallement Bicycle blanket patent in1886.

Thomas B. Jeffery & Co. never made application to the ALAM, and never paid any royalties. Yet no suit was filed, probably for two reasons:

1) Pope had already come out on the wrong end of a blanket-patent war with Jeffery in the Lallement matter, and consideration was probably paid to the fact that Jeffery had never lost, regardless of which side he was on. He had successfully prosecuted his own patents for the clincher tire, and tire makers were already beholden to Jeffery for fees on that patent. Cars without tires are not very saleable.

2) Thomas B. Jeffery & Co. , and TBJ himself, each held vast financial resources, and could make a court fight a very expensive proposition.

In 1903, Henry Ford made application to the ALAM, whose stated public goals were to protect the public from “unsafe and shoddy design, and fly by nights incapable of honest business”. Ford’s application was denied, probably because most of the members were from Detroit, and felt that Detroit had enough competition. The main reason given for the denial was that Ford had already had two business failures(Detroit Motor Co. and the Henry Ford Co.), and that his cars were only “assembled”, not truly manufactured. In fact, these things were true of the majority of the existing members of the ALAM.

Ford felt that the ALAM had insulted his design and engineering skills, and was outraged. He issued a statement refusing to pay royalties and stating that the patent was worthless. A suit was filed against Ford Motor Co. by the ALAM, and additionally they took out ads attacking Ford, and threatening prosecution against anyone who bought his products. Ford responded with ads of his own, promising 12 million dollars legal protection to his customers.

During the 7-year course of the suit, which progressed through decisions against Ford and multiple appeals, Thomas B. Jeffery & Co. contributed expansive amounts to Ford’s legal defense. TBJ knew what the final outcome would be. In the course of one hearing, an automobile race began forming in the street outside the courthouse. Ford’s lawyer, upon looking out the window, told the judge, “Your Honor, I see a few Duryeas out there, and many Fords, but not one single Selden!”. This, of course, pointed up the fact that Selden was a lawyer, not an engineer.

The judge ordered in 1904 that an automobile be built by the ALAM to the specifications of the Selden Patent. In due course, it was self-evident that the car wasnot viable from an engineering and operating standpoint. The final ruling in 1911 was that while the Selden Patent was valid, the type of engine and its mounting design meant that Ford had not infringed upon the patent.

No one paid license fees after that, and the ALAM faded away. Once again the Father of the Rambler had been proven right. Although he did not fight the patent overtly, he had contributed a substantial amount over the years to help fund the fight. Now a second industry owed its prosperity at least in part to theRambler name

 

Additional developments in 1904 included an explosion at the Standard Wheel Company, and they removed their backing from the Overland venture. Claude Cox, the founder, was able to buy Overland outright for $8,000.

Steering wheels became standard equipment on Ramblers for 1904.

Rambler introduced two new cars, the Model K and the Model L. In addition, there was a delivery wagon based on the Model K.A 1904 Rambler Model D made a trip from Laramie, Wyoming to New York City, bringing total mileage on the vehicle to 26,000 miles.


Frank Leslies’ Popular monthly featured a special on “The Automobiles of 1904“.

Drat! All this peering about at the past has once more exhausted the power source for the Time Command unit. We must again take our leave of history and return to the present, as it becomes necessary to rejuvenate the battery.
-mike

Mitchell & Lewis Company LTD. 1855-1910

Mitchell & Lewis Company LTD., Nash Motor Company, Mitchell-Lewis, Rambler TimeLine Chronicles| 1 Comment »


Mitchell & Lewis Company LTD.

1855-1910

Mitchell-Lewis Motor Co. started out as Mitchell & Lewis Company, Limited, in 1855, after H. Mitchell wagons, established 1834, moved to Racine, Wisconsin. In 1900, they organized a separate business called Mitchell-Lewis Motor Co.(producers of the Mitchell Motor Bicycle), and also still operated Mitchell & Lewis Co., Ltd. until 1910, when the wagon making was combined into the Mitchell-Lewis Motor Company.

From that point on, they manufactured large, respectable automobiles, until purchased in 1924 by Nash Motor Company.


A couple of views of an 1894 Mitchell & Lewis Chuckwagon


A view of the Henry Mitchell house in Racine, Wisconsin USA.


1876 Mitchell Wagon Dealership Ad

Mitchell Wagon Magazine ad

More as I discover it…

-mike

The Early Years: 1845-1882

Gormully & Jeffery Mfg., Mitchell & Lewis Company LTD., Thomas B. Jeffery & Co., Rambler TimeLine Chronicles| No Comments »

Way back in the beginning…

It's a long way there and back...

As far as I can tell, the oldest firm with a direct link to the Rambler line appears to be H. Mitchell Wagons, established 1834. This company was the predecessor to Mitchell and Lewis Company Ltd.
However, the The dim, distant past of the Rambler line begins with its creator, a man named Thomas Buckland Jeffery.Thomas B. was born on February 5, 1845 in Plymouth, Devon, England, in an area known as Stoke Damerel.

Maps of Plymouth, England

His father was a postal carrier at the time. I haven’t found much information on his early life, but it is known that at age 18, in 1863, he emigrated from England to America.

The city of Chicago was where he ended up, and he worked there as an optical technician, a lensmaker. He learned crafting and technical work, and began making models for inventors to submit with patent applications. This was a requirement of patent applications at the time.

Along the way, he hooked up with an acquaintance from England in Chicago, whose name was R. Philip GormullyDuring the Great Chicago Fire, Jeffery’s model making shop was destroyed, and he was forced to re-enter the optical trade for a time, to generate some capital for the reopening of his modelmaking business.
He married Kate Elizabeth Wray in 1874, and began to produce baby carriages as well. During the 1870’s he marketed a railroad velocipede,

1895 Railway Velocipede

a small one-man foot powered vehicle for the railway. I have so far been unable to locate a picture of his actual vehicle. There are several inventors of these vehicles, and there are several types, but I suspect that it appeared similar to the bicycle-based version.

1883 Railway Velocipede

In 1878, Jeffery went back to England on vacation, experienced his first bicycle ride, and of course, in 1879 entered the bicycle manufacturing trade. In 1881, he and R. Philip Gormully formed Gormully and Jeffery Manufacturing. They called their product the American bicycle, beginning with an ordinary(big front wheel) called the Ideal.

1887 Ideal Bicycle by G & J Mfg.

With the advent of the “safety bicycle”, essentially the same design as modern bicycles, the new model American was called the Rambler, and a legend was born.
1892 American Rambler Bicycles Ad

From the Open Library Project:

A Family in Kenosha

“A Family in Kenosha”-

A magazine article by Beverly Rae Kimes, detailing some of the early Rambler history. Appeared in the 2nd Quarter 1978 issue of Automobile Quarterly Magazine. Scanned and kindly contributed to my effort by a friend in Alberta. Contains some beautiful pictures of early Rambler automobiles.

powered by…

Route 66 Rambler

These Are The Chronicles…

Rambler TimeLine Chronicles| No Comments »

Rambler TimeLine

These Are The Chronicles…




This is the Rambler TimeLine Chronicles, or just TimeLine for short. This is a project to chart the history of AMC, Rambler, and their ancestors and descendants. We also want to remember the people involved in a huge project like a major American automobile maker, tens of thousands of people in the end.



I have another web site, that has a lot of AMC-related information, but it’s hard to sort through, because all that makes it an organized project is me, labelling my collection . There is no way to find out how many of these “labels” there are, and what kind of label they might be, or what they might say. Or how many are related to a certain type of question in a certain way.


1933 Nash


The AMC Heritage Forum is in need of an information archive, similar to a WikiPedia or some other information management system, like spreadsheets and databases, or publishing programs with too many limitations, etc.



To solve The AMC Heritage Forum’s need of an information archive-type resource, I have decided to use the Forum/RustBucket’s database, to organize my Rambler TimeLine over at Route 66 Rambler, solving the organization problem there at the same time. That means that here on the Forum, we will now have a pile of reference information. And at Route 66 Rambler, I will finally be able to sort through the piles and piles of stuff I have, and be able to present it in a more meaningful way. The two will still be separate, and independent from each other, but there will now probably be at least one link to the web site from the Forum. Probably something like a “powered by” or “hosted by” type of logo.


As I enter pieces of information from the pages and file folders of Route 66 Rambler, it will become part of The Forum’s very structure. This will be more than a “Ramblerpedia” or “Jeeptionary”. It will tie the repository of information, into the live, everyday conversations taking place on the boards of The AMC Heritage Forum.


And, every thing that is posted or written in The AMC Heritage Forum, will become part of the database, as well. So will everything from the RustBucket Gallery, and this very page you are reading. In fact, this page is already on the database, because it was created there in the first place. And it carries along with it, every word or picture that is in this article.


It will be organized into the database in a year-by-year organization, but all these books, magazine ads, brochures, manuals, photos, discussions on the forum, links, and people, are related to each other, and this will provide us a way to follow a question, until we find an answer, or a need for more information.


What That Means for Us, is that we are going to have a way to start matching pieces of information to each other, by their relationships.

And we really just want to know how it all fits together, right?

-mike


powered by...